Why are temperature predictions from climate models of alarmists significantly above the real world results in every case (73 out of 73)?
Why are temperature predictions from climate models of alarmists significantly above the real world results in every case (73 out of 73)?. Are You sir & mam has that kind of concern?, If do then please get the good answer right after this line:
Since climate models are used to make projections rather than predictions, your claim canât be true. Predictions might be made concerning how much CO2 and other greenhouse gases are added to the atmosphere from human activities. These would depend on a combination of individual and political decisions that often arenât made on the basis of science, and there are large uncertainties in such predictions.
These uncertainties go into climate models, and usually a large range of possibilities are used as inputs. Projections of possible outcomes are then generated by running the models. Yet the results have been surprisingly good. See.
Since there have been astronomically more than 73 runs of the best climate models, it is very possible that 73 cases could be cherry picked that didnât turn out well. Could you provide the specifics for your 73 cases? If so I would be interested to see how well the inputs of greenhouse gas production matched what has really happened. A good model cannot be expected to make great projections with inputs that are not realistic.
We at this website hope if those solutions listed above could answer your question. Take care